Which is better for power user or gamer – ASUS RT-AX89X vs GT-AX11000? Do they have Adaptive QoS prioritizes game packets for smoother online play? Do they have built-in wtfast to seek out and secure the shortest possible path between your gaming device and the game server, minimizing game ping and lag? Reveal more in ASUS RT-AX89X vs GT-AX11000 differences.
Pros & Cons – ASUS RT-AX89X vs GT-AX11000
- Good and practical build design.
- Powerful yet efficient processor.
- A wide variety of connectivity options.
- Great features that are useful, e.g. Aiprotection.
- Internal fan may need replacement after some time
Subscribe to our buying guide - critics reviews & comparison!
- Very fast throughput speeds.
- Useful settings for online gaming.
- Supports Ai Mesh technology.
- User friendly software that supports android and apple devices.
- Takes a long time to reboot when settings are changed
Compare ASUS RT-AX89X vs GT-AX11000
|Model||Asusrt- ax89x (Winner)||Asusgt- ax11000|
|Connectivity options||8Gigabit LAN, 1Gigabit WAN, 2 USB 3.0 ports||1WAN,4LAN, 2 USB 3.0 ports|
|Throughput speeds||2.4GHz- 1148 Mbps, 5GHz 1300Mbps||2.4GHz- 1200Mbps, 5GHz- 4800Mbps|
|No. of antennas||8 antennas (foldable)||8 antennas|
|Size||13.52 x 13.52 x 3.15 inches||9.4 x 9.4 x 2.8 inches|
|Processor||2.2GHz quad-core processor, 1GB of RAM, 256 MB storage space||1.8GHZ Quadcore processor, 1GB of RAM, 256 MB storage space|
ASUS RT-AX89X vs GT-AX11000: is there any difference?
Measuring 13.52 x 13.52 x 3.15 inches, AX89X is equipped with 8 antennas that can be folded in various different ways. Folding these antennas will allow the router to fit in small spaces on shelves therefore you won’t have to worry about re- arranging your whole living room again in order to accommodate the router. The Asus gt- ax11000 on the other hand, measures 9.4 x 9.4 x 2.8 inchesand has 8 antennas that can only be in a fixed position to maximise on the best signal strengths.
Tri-Band Vs Dual Band – 2.5gb ethernet Vs 10gb ethernet
They’re realistically the main differences. Depends if you find the 3rd band more useful than a 10gb ethernet connection. In my case I do as I use it for aimesh and like having my ax devices on their own band.
The AX11000 doesn’t have 10 gig ports while the AX89X has both SFP+ and 10GBase-T. The AX89X has eight LAN ports vs. only four on the AX11000. The AX11000’s 4-core processor is 1.8 GHz but the AX89X runs at 2.2 GHz.
The major difference is Broadcom (AX11000) vs Qualcomm (AX89X) base SoC spec. Everything else is a secondary evolution from there on down, period.
On the wired side, the 89X is dedicates all Aquantia throughput to WAN at 10Gb/s (as they should), no fancy software-hooey necessary. The 11000 implements the same chip split-purpose for 2.5Gb WAN or LAN, which in theory is nice for a few simultaneous sessions on a lightweight home network, but won’t hold a candle to a discrete, multi-gig managed switch when the need for beefier multi-port queuing arises (and that can happen sooner than one might think).
On the wireless side, the 89X has more overall potential, as Qualcomm wifi is generally the higher-quality experience, BUT, especially in the AX space right now, they’re trailing behind Broadcom majorly with product and driver presence, so I suppose the AX11000 would be the lesser of two evils, for now. That said, once the boys over at OpenWRT figure out how to stabilize ath11k drivers by next year and get proven builds established for the RAX120, AX89X, and friends, it’ll be game-over. Especially because the AX11000 will likely never see Merlin support.
The the ax11000 is better as the extra radio means being able to handle more devices without slowing down due to concurrent connections when multiple devices are streaming and downloading.
If you have 10gb internet, or anything above a 2.5gb internet connection, or a NAS with a 10gb ethernet port, then yes, the ax89x would serve you better, otherwise the 10gb port is pretty pointless for you. (Bear in mind, the ax11000 has a 2.5gb lan/wan port for when you have outragous internet speeds).
Which one should you buy – ASUS RT-AX89X vs GT-AX11000?
Best for Gamers : ASUS GT-AX11000
The ASUS ROG Rapture Wi-Fi 6 router is tailor-made for gamers. It uses a much more powerful 1.8 GHz quad-core processor to deliver speedier connections and better overall performance. ASUS says it’s capable of downloading a 256 GB game in just 47 minutes.
Besides its blazing-fast speeds, what we like is that the router features a second 5 GHz frequency band that’s dedicated strictly to your gaming devices. Meaning other streaming devices, smartphones, and laptops won’t be competing for precious bandwidth.
Best for Power Users – ASUS RT-AX89X
Not to be confused with the ASUS RT-AX89U, the ASUS RT-AX89X is the first Wi-Fi 6 router to feature two 10 Gbps network ports. This means you can enjoy up to 10 times faster speeds than traditional routers. With a total networking speed of about 6,000 Mbps — that’s 1,148 Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band and 4,804 Mbps on the 5 GHz band — this 8×8 router provides the best speeds in the business.
As you’d expect, the router packs plenty of security settings to protect against data theft and it offers advanced parental controls. Compared to the other Wi-Fi 6 routers, this one supports Dual-WAN and link aggregation, too. It’s also packed with eight Gigabit LAN ports and one Gigabit WAN port.
- What is the ASUS RT-AX88U best price? Get review
- Netgear Nighthawk R7000P vs R7000 MU-MIMO comparison : is it good for gaming?
- Nighthawk R7000P Smart WiFi Router AC2300 review – how to do setup?
- Netgear Nighthawk 5G mobile hotspot (MR5000) review – what is the WiFi range?
- ARRIS SURFboard SBG10 DOCSIS 3.0 cable modem review – how to setup & troubleshooting?