What is the best NVIDIA graphics cards in order of performance? Integrated graphics are more than capable of streaming video or tackling your productivity workload. But if you want to dive into the latest AAA adventure or to handle graphically intense projects like 3D modeling, game development, or video rendering., you need powerful graphics card. To help find the right one for you, we’ve narrowed things down to make it simpler to choose.
What is the best NVIDIA graphics cards in order of performance – GPU Benchmarks
| Score | GPU | Base/Boost | Memory | Power | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 | 100.0% | GA102 | 1400/1695 MHz | 24GB GDDR6X | 350W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 97.9% | GA102 | 1370/1665 MHz | 12GB GDDR6X | 350W |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | 97.0% | Navi 21 | 1825/2250 MHz | 16GB GDDR6 | 300W |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | 93.5% | Navi 21 | 1825/2250 MHz | 16GB GDDR6 | 300W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 | 93.2% | GA102 | 1440/1710 MHz | 10GB GDDR6X | 320W |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | 85.7% | Navi 21 | 1700/2105 MHz | 16GB GDDR6 | 250W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 81.5% | GA104 | 1575/1770 MHz | 8GB GDDR6X | 290W |
| Nvidia Titan RTX | 79.5% | TU102 | 1350/1770 MHz | 24GB GDDR6 | 280W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 77.4% | TU102 | 1350/1635 MHz | 11GB GDDR6 | 260W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 | 76.3% | GA104 | 1500/1730 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 220W |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | 73.3% | Navi 22 | 2321/2424 MHz | 12GB GDDR6 | 230W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 69.6% | GA104 | 1410/1665 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 200W |
| Nvidia Titan V | 68.7% | GV100 | 1200/1455 MHz | 12GB HBM2 | 250W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 66.8% | TU104 | 1650/1815 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 250W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 | 62.5% | TU104 | 1515/1800 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 225W |
| Nvidia Titan Xp | 61.1% | GP102 | 1405/1480 MHz | 12GB GDDR5X | 250W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 59.6% | TU104 | 1605/1770 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 215W |
| AMD Radeon VII | 58.9% | Vega 20 | 1400/1750 MHz | 16GB HBM2 | 300W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 57.8% | GP102 | 1480/1582 MHz | 11GB GDDR5X | 250W |
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | 57.7% | Navi 23 | 1968/2589 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 160W |
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | 57.0% | Navi 10 | 1605/1905 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 225W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 54.7% | GA106 | 1320/1777 MHz | 12GB GDDR6 | 170W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 | 53.1% | TU106 | 1410/1710 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 185W |
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | 51.4% | Navi 10 | 1465/1725 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 185W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | 50.6% | TU106 | 1470/1650 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 175W |
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 | 49.2% | Navi 23 | 1626/2491 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 132W |
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | 48.4% | Vega 10 | 1274/1546 MHz | 8GB HBM2 | 295W |
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | 46.6% | Navi 10 | ?/1615 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 150W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 | 45.2% | GP104 | 1607/1733 MHz | 8GB GDDR5X | 180W |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 | 44.9% | TU106 | 1365/1680 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 160W |
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | 42.7% | Vega 10 | 1156/1471 MHz | 8GB HBM2 | 210W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 41.8% | GP104 | 1607/1683 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 180W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 37.9% | TU116 | 1530/1785 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 125W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 37.8% | TU116 | 1365/1680 MHz | 6GB GDDR6 | 120W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 | 36.7% | GP104 | 1506/1683 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 150W |
| Nvidia GTX Titan X (Maxwell) | 35.3% | GM200 | 1000/1075 MHz | 12GB GDDR5 | 250 |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 32.9% | GM200 | 1000/1075 MHz | 6GB GDDR5 | 250W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 | 32.8% | TU116 | 1530/1785 MHz | 6GB GDDR5 | 120W |
| AMD Radeon R9 Fury X | 32.7% | Fiji | 1050 MHz | 4GB HBM | 275W |
| AMD Radeon RX 590 | 32.4% | Polaris 30 | 1469/1545 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 225W |
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | 31.8% | Navi 14 | ?/1717 MHz | 8GB GDDR6 | 130W |
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | 30.9% | Polaris 20 | 1257/1340 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 185W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super | 28.5% | TU116 | 1530/1725 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 100W |
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | 28.4% | Navi 14 | ?/1717 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 130W |
| AMD Radeon R9 390 | 27.2% | Hawaii | 1000 MHz | 8GB GDDR5 | 275W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 26.5% | GP106 | 1506/1708 MHz | 6GB GDDR5 | 120W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 | 26.4% | GM204 | 1126/1216 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 165W |
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | 25.2% | Polaris 20 | 1168/1244 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 150W |
| Nvidia GTX 1650 GDDR6 | 23.8% | TU117 | 1410/1590 MHz | 4GB GDDR6 | 75W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | 22.3% | GP106 | 1506/1708 MHz | 3GB GDDR5 | 120W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 | 22.1% | GM204 | 1050/1178 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 145W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 | 20.9% | TU117 | 1485/1665 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 75W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 16.1% | GP107 | 1290/1392 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 75W |
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | 12.5% | Polaris 21 | 1175/1275 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 80W |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 | 12.2% | GP107 | 1354/1455 MHz | 2GB GDDR5 | 75W |
| AMD Vega 8 (R7 5700G) | 9.5% | Vega 8 | 2000 MHz | Shared | N/A |
| AMD Vega 7 (R5 5600G) | 8.8% | Vega 7 | 1900 MHz | Shared | N/A |
| AMD Radeon RX 550 | 8.0% | Polaris 22 | 1100/1183 MHz | 4GB GDDR5 | 50W |
| Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 | 6.7% | GP108 | 1228/1468 MHz | 2GB GDDR5 | 30W |
| AMD Vega 11 (R5 3400G) | 5.5% | Vega 11 | 1400 MHz | Shared | N/A |
| AMD Vega 8 (R3 3200G) | 4.9% | Vega 8 | 1250 MHz | Shared | N/A |
| Intel Iris Xe DG1 | 4.4% | Xe DG1 | 1550 MHz | 4GB LPDDR4X | 30W |
| Intel Iris Plus (i7-1065G7) | 3.0% | Gen11 ICL-U | 1100 MHz | Shared | N/A |
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 (i7-10700K) | 1.8% | Gen9.5 CFL | 1200 MHz | 2x8GB DDR4-3200 | N/A |
Best NVIDIA graphics cards in order of gaming performance – Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
SPECIFICATIONS
CUDA cores: 8,704Base clock: 1,440 MHzBoost clock: 1,710 MHzTFLOPs: 29.76Memory: 10GB GDDR6XMemory clock: 19 GT/sMemory bandwidth: 760 GB/s
REASONS TO BUY
+Incredible gen-on-gen performance+Makes 2080 Ti look mid-range+Ray tracing no longer a sacrifice
REASONS TO AVOID
-Needs a beefy PSU-In high demand
Okay, right now, the RTX 3080 is rare as pigeon eyelashes, but there is no doubt Nvidia’s new RTX 3080 is the best graphics card today. It represents a huge generational performance boost over the previous RTX 20-series. That’s impressive when put up against either the RTX 2080 or 2080 Super, but when you consider that this nominally $699 card can not just match but massively outperform the $1,200 RTX 2080 Ti, it really hits home.
The thing which really stands out from our testing is the difference it makes to ray-tracing performance. The first generation of ray tracing-capable cards required such a huge frame rate sacrifice that most people shied away from turning it on, but that’s no longer the case with this generation.
When you can now get ray-traced performance that exceeds the frame rates you’d get out of the top card of the RTX 20-series when running without it, you know that this is a whole different beast. And hey, the RTX 3080 can actually run Crysis.
Nvidia has managed this by adding a whole load more CUDA cores to the mix in this 8nm GPU and updated Tensor Cores (for extra DLSS goodness) and second-gen RT Cores to make with the ray-traced pretties.
The RTX 3080 may need a fair chunk more power—you’ll want at least an 850W PSU—and be tricky to get hold of, but this is the most desirable graphics card around today. Which I guess is also why it’s so tricky to get hold of.
For budget concern – AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
SPECIFICATIONS
RDNA cores: 5,120Base clock: 1,825 MHzBoost clock: 2,250 MHzTFLOPs: 23.04Memory: 16GB GDDR6Memory clock: 16 GT/sMemory bandwidth: 512 GB/s
REASONS TO BUY
+Occasional RTX 3090 performance…+…but cheaper!
REASONS TO AVOID
-Can lag behind RTX 3080 at times-Mediocre ray-tracing performanceAdvertisement
The RTX 3090 may have sat unchallenged at the top rungs of graphics performance at launch, but it wouldn’t be long until AMD rustled together a challenger in the RX 6900 XT, or ‘Big Navi.’ The RX 6900 XT hopes to knock Ampere’s finest from its perch on high and send it spiraling back down to Earth. And it gets kind of close, too, with 4K performance a little off the pace of the RTX 3090—and all for one-third off the asking price.
For that reason, it’s simply the better buy for any PC gamer without any ulterior motives of the pro-creator variety. But there’s a reason it’s not number one in our graphics card guide today, and that’s simply due to the fact it’s not that much better than an RTX 3080, and sometimes not at all. It’s another $300 on top of the RTX 3080’s price tag, and you’d hope for higher performance in both rasterized and ray tracing workloads. Yet, inevitably its ray-tracing acceleration lags behind the competition.
But the RX 6900 XT does come with assurances that the RTX 3080 can’t make, such as its 16GB of GDDR6 memory, which is a whole 6GB greater than the 10GB of (faster) GDDR6X memory on the green team card. With that in mind, for raw gaming alone, the RX 6900 XT is a cheaper alternative to the RTX 3090 is still a victim to its own extreme price tag.
Best Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti graphics cards in order of performance under $400
SPECIFICATIONS
CUDA cores: 4,864Base clock: 1,410 MHzBoost clock: 1,665 MHzTFLOPs: 16.20Memory: 8GB GDDR6Memory clock: 14 GT/sMemory bandwidth: 448 GB/s
REASONS TO BUY
+Finally! Something a little more affordable+2080 Super performance+Under $400
REASONS TO AVOID
-Annoying 12-pin power connector-Not quite good enough for 4KAdvertisement
The best value Ampere to date, the RTX 3060 Ti is very closely related to the RTX 3070. Both utilize the same GA104 GPU (the RTX 3060 Ti has fewer SMs enabled), with the same 8GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus.
While 17% less capable in core count, the RTX 3060 Ti makes up for it with some judicious GPU Boost frequencies. That partially explains why the RTX 3060 Ti can be within 17% to just single digits off the pace of the RTX 3070, despite operating at a silicon disadvantage. Not bad for a $399 card (if you can find it for that price).
If you haven’t already done the maths: At $399, the RTX 3060 Ti is 20% cheaper than the RTX 3070, so performance per dollar is on the up with the diminutive graphics card. That’s why we love it so; it’s a great GPU for the full stack of resolutions and has decent ray tracing capability to boot, courtesy of second-generation RT Cores.
If the RTX 3080 or RTX 3070 seem out of reach, the RTX 3060 Ti certainly makes for a decent stand-in. Perhaps most impressive of this graphics card is how it stacks up to the 20-series generation: It topples the RTX 2080 Super in nearly every test.
Best Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 12GB graphics cards in order of GPU performance
SPECIFICATIONS
CUDA cores: 3,584Base clock: 1,320 MHzBoost clock: 1,777 MHzTFLOPs: 12.74Memory: 12GB GDDR6Memory clock: 15 GT/sMemory bandwidth: 360 GB/s
REASONS TO BUY
+Ready for 60fps at 1440p or greater+Decent gen-on-gen performance improvement+More readily available to purchase in pre-built PCs
REASONS TO AVOID
-Not always massively faster than an RTX 2060-RTX 3060 Ti is a better buy at $399
The decision to load the RTX 3060 with 12GB of GDDR6 memory appeared a strange one at first, and in many ways it still is. It’s more memory than the RTX 3080, after all, albeit slower stuff, and it tops out the RTX 3060 Ti too. However, the RTX 3060 wields it well, managing to dispatch the RTX 2060 by a large margin in most games, and by enough of a gap in the rest to make it worthwhile.
And we’re not going to turn our noses up at 12GB of VRAM when 6GB is the likely alternative.
With a decent generation-on-generation improvement and plenty of speed at 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 3060 12GB is a graphics card easily argued for. It’s also nominally cheaper than the RTX 2060 was on launch day, though it’s not so easy to find it as a discrete number nowadays.
The new king of GeForce gaming – Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
SPECIFICATIONS
CUDA cores: 10,240Base clock: 1,365 MHzBoost clock: 1,665 MHzTFLOPs: 34.10Memory: 12GB GDDR6XMemory clock: 19 GT/sMemory bandwidth: 912.4 GB/s
REASONS TO BUY
+Superb 4K performance+Nearly an RTX 3090 for less cash+Excellent ray tracing capability
REASONS TO AVOID
-A lot pricier than the RTX 3080-Power hungry at 350W-Runs pretty hotAdvertisement
The RTX 3080 Ti isn’t the mightiest GeForce graphics card that Nvidia makes. That accolade goes to the RTX 3090, by a hair, and will be claimed by the RTX 3090 Ti once that arrives. Though when all is said and benchmarked, it is the uber high-end RTX 3080 Ti that we’d recommend to any PC gamer looking to go all out on their next build.
With performance close to the RTX 3090 at 4K, the RTX 3080 Ti is as much a gaming graphics card as its progenitor. With a vast bounty of CUDA Cores and speedy GDDR6X memory, this card demolishes any game you can throw at it with relative ease. It’s also more than capable of real-time ray tracing, courtesy of 80 RT Cores.
The reason we don’t rate this card higher up in our list of the best graphics cards, however, is down to its price. Launching at $1,200, it’s only a stone’s throw away from the $1,499 RTX 3090. Massively inflated pricing, or lack of stock, notwithstanding.
